<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Psalm 12:7 - What or who is it referring to?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unboundedwords.com/blog/archives/32/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unboundedwords.com/blog/archives/32</link>
	<description>About Anything and Everything</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TOM GOLDASICH</title>
		<link>http://unboundedwords.com/blog/archives/32#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>TOM GOLDASICH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unboundedwords.com/blog/archives/32#comment-92</guid>
		<description>When will this KJ-only nonsense stop?

God's Word did not originate in English and never will be proven of any more value than the best we have today.

Pride and Arrogance of the first order are obvious in pro-KJ posts.

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will this KJ-only nonsense stop?</p>
<p>God&#8217;s Word did not originate in English and never will be proven of any more value than the best we have today.</p>
<p>Pride and Arrogance of the first order are obvious in pro-KJ posts.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://unboundedwords.com/blog/archives/32#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 12:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unboundedwords.com/blog/archives/32#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Chris,
    I really didn't word my question right.  I meant " modern versions".  I knew about all those earlier ones and even the NKJV.  I was given a NKJV by my dad and mom when I was ordained in 1992.  I preached out of it for many years because they had used the TR.  But one day I realized they also used critical Greek New Testament text and Kittel's Hebrew Old Testament critical test rather that the traditional Hebrew Masoretic text.  You find this in the preface of a NKJV. The others I have never heard of but I will look forward to checking them out.  In  my seminary class on the preservation of the text these were never mentioned.  Again I guess my question should have stated "based entirely on the TR."  Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,<br />
    I really didn&#8217;t word my question right.  I meant &#8221; modern versions&#8221;.  I knew about all those earlier ones and even the NKJV.  I was given a NKJV by my dad and mom when I was ordained in 1992.  I preached out of it for many years because they had used the TR.  But one day I realized they also used critical Greek New Testament text and Kittel&#8217;s Hebrew Old Testament critical test rather that the traditional Hebrew Masoretic text.  You find this in the preface of a NKJV. The others I have never heard of but I will look forward to checking them out.  In  my seminary class on the preservation of the text these were never mentioned.  Again I guess my question should have stated &#8220;based entirely on the TR.&#8221;  Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://unboundedwords.com/blog/archives/32#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 02:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unboundedwords.com/blog/archives/32#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://unboundedwords.com/blog/archives/32#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 20:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unboundedwords.com/blog/archives/32#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Sure,

Off the top of my head

Tyndale
Geneva
Great Bible
Bishop's Bible
Webster's Revision of the King James Version
Modern King James Version
Young's Literal Version
The Literal Version (Green's)
New King James Version (Yes, it really is)
Easy Reading King James Version
KJV 21

Majority Text Based Versions - The Majority text is a more recently compiled Greek Text based on the same family of mss as the Textus Receptus.
One was compiled by Maurice Robinson a strong Majority text advocate and Greek professor. The other by Zane Hodges and Arthur Farstad. Since many more Byzantine family manuscripts have been found since the work of Erasmus, Beza, and Stephens, these works are considered superior. They agree with the TR almost exactly, but since there are variants it would be impossible for them to be exact. Of course you know that no two editions of the TR&lt;em&gt; (which wasn't so named until after the KJV translators used a pick and choose method)&lt;/em&gt; are the same.

World English Bible
English Majority Text Version
Analytical Literal Translation
KJ3

Hope this helps. Sorry it took so long, I have been doing homework, and didn't see the message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure,</p>
<p>Off the top of my head</p>
<p>Tyndale<br />
Geneva<br />
Great Bible<br />
Bishop&#8217;s Bible<br />
Webster&#8217;s Revision of the King James Version<br />
Modern King James Version<br />
Young&#8217;s Literal Version<br />
The Literal Version (Green&#8217;s)<br />
New King James Version (Yes, it really is)<br />
Easy Reading King James Version<br />
KJV 21</p>
<p>Majority Text Based Versions - The Majority text is a more recently compiled Greek Text based on the same family of mss as the Textus Receptus.<br />
One was compiled by Maurice Robinson a strong Majority text advocate and Greek professor. The other by Zane Hodges and Arthur Farstad. Since many more Byzantine family manuscripts have been found since the work of Erasmus, Beza, and Stephens, these works are considered superior. They agree with the TR almost exactly, but since there are variants it would be impossible for them to be exact. Of course you know that no two editions of the TR<em> (which wasn&#8217;t so named until after the KJV translators used a pick and choose method)</em> are the same.</p>
<p>World English Bible<br />
English Majority Text Version<br />
Analytical Literal Translation<br />
KJ3</p>
<p>Hope this helps. Sorry it took so long, I have been doing homework, and didn&#8217;t see the message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://unboundedwords.com/blog/archives/32#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unboundedwords.com/blog/archives/32#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Chris,
    Interesting.  Could you give me a list of those translations that are based on the TR?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,<br />
    Interesting.  Could you give me a list of those translations that are based on the TR?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
